This week The Economist featured Leaders and Briefing articles on the City of London. The term "the City" refers to the financial district and the articles described the changes in regulation and challenges from competitors that the City faces. I do not want to offer opinions on the regulatory debate, but did like the description of the forces of second nature geography in the articles. The strength of the City lies in a pooled labour market, suppliers of specialised services and knowledge spillovers that reinforce this agglomeration.
The City
is not helpless in meeting this challenge. Incumbency is a powerful barrier in
industries, such as finance, where there are strong network effects. Trading
attracts liquidity and thus more trading. A steady supply of skilled financiers
adds to the virtuous circle.
The use
of English around the world gives London an edge over other European centres.
London goes to work in the middle of the global trading day: the City day
starts just as Asia’s financial markets are closing and its financiers are
still at their desks when the New York market opens. That makes it an ideal
spot for global asset managers. One-third of the £4.8 trillion of funds managed
in Britain is on behalf of foreigners, according to TheCityUK. London is also
an ideal place to strike deals between parties from different countries,
because of its highly respected body of commercial law and experienced judges.
London’s
lead in foreign exchange, as well as in interest-rate derivatives, grew out of
its reinvention in the 1960s and 1970s as an offshore centre for dollar
deposit-taking and lending, after sterling’s decline as a reserve currency.
When the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates broke down, London was
quick to establish itself as a venue for trading currencies and hedging the risk
of floating exchange rates. Twice as much foreign-exchange trading goes on in
London as in New York and Tokyo combined. Having staked out this ground early
and occupied it for so long, London would be hard to dislodge.
All this
suggests that finance is not quite as mobile as some of its practitioners like
to pretend. So far, only a few finance outfits, mostly hedge funds or commodity
traders, have moved (usually to Switzerland) to escape higher taxes, onerous
regulation and public hostility. The best hedge-fund traders are often
contrarian thinkers, who might benefit from distance from the crowd. Not every
business is quite as footloose. For outfits that raise capital and sell
securities, it is much harder to operate efficiently at a distance from clients
and complementary businesses.
No comments:
Post a Comment