Showing posts with label Economic indicators. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Economic indicators. Show all posts

Friday, 1 June 2012

On subnational data - pick your black box

South Africa faces significant challenges such as a low economic growth rate, high unemployment rate, high poverty rate and substantial inequality.  I often argue that these problems and their possible solutions have a spatial dimension that is neglected.  But, to support local economic development the public and private sectors require access to reliable sub-national data.  Statistics South Africa collects and disseminates socio-economic data, but information about local economies is limited to two private sector databases: Global Insight's REX and Quantec's Regional indicators.Recently, one of my Master's students set out to compare the two databases and we found some interesting differences.

The first thing to note is that in both cases the data are derived or imputed. This in itself is not a problem - it is also the case with for example the EU's NUTS-3 data - but the questions are about the amount of source data that do exist and the assumptions made to generate economic data at municipal level. It has been said that sub-national economic data in South Africa are not suitable for dynamic analysis because it is generated from aggregate GDP figures on the basis of a static algorithm. Our look at the data did not find simple disaggregation of official national or provincial total to the municipal level based on some or other fixed proportion, or fixed growth rates over time. We did find some interesting differences in, for example, population numbers.

There is hardly any way of knowing which is more correct, so for the economic data we argued as follows. If you subscribe to the idea that agglomerations of economic activity are characterised by cumulative causation and path dependency you would expect that over the short period for which there is data available, some places would grow faster and others slower than the national average but there would be persistence in relative positions and ranking. This is typically what the databases show. There is a lot more in the dissertation about the growth rates of GVA and different places' share of GVA, but the table below gives a brief summary of a test of rankings.


Each database shows internal consistency, but there are large (and significant) differences in rankings of places' share of GVA between the two databases.

Our conclusion: There is no evidence that the private sector databases are a simple breakdown of national or provincial numbers. There are no exploding standard errors. But the databases are black boxes and they differ substantively. They should not be used together. It is a question of picking your black box. 

What we need is an academic, open source dataset - a resource that can be vetted, applied and improved by all users.

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

A few thoughts about economic indicators

This is not geographical economics, but last week saw some interesting posts about economic indicators and I thought that I can write a bit more about it. It started with The Economist's misery index which looks at the unemployment rate and inflation rate as indicators of economic gloom. According to their daily graph South Africa lies fourth out of 92 countries.


This solicited different responses in the Twitterverse. Some were glad that it seems that unemployment is below 25% according to the EIU and others argued that our unemployment is structural rather than cyclical and implies a different kind of gloom. Prof Frederick Fourie's "Three worlds, three discourses" paper about the unemployment debate links up with this.

During the week Classic Business (on Classic FM 102.7) hosted a show in which they asked guests what they think the economic indicators are that South Africans should obsess about. There were some interesting points of view. Economists are of course interested in the performance of the economy, but cannot afford to wait for quarterly GDP or unemployment statistics. They are particularly interested in predictors or leading indicators of economic performance:
  • Dennis Dykes (Nedbank) looks at credit numbers as advanced warning about what might happen with interest rates. They give a feel of what is happening with consumption demand, the housing market and corporate loan demand (fixed investment spending).
  • Loane Sharpe (Adcorp) mentioned notes and coins in circulation as an indicator of consumer buoyancy, arguing that economic performance depends on a consumption-oriented middle class and emerging informal sector.
  • Tony Twine (Econometrix) said that NUMSA vehicle sales data take the greatest proportion of his time. He is interested in the macro forces that drive auto sales numbers - if you have the vehicle sales data, you can figure out the macro forces. He says that vehicle sales is such an important indicator since passenger car sales is a barometer of economic activity and  truck sales an indicator an of what is happening with fixed capital formation.
This is exactly the sort of things that I think our third year Economics students should start to get interested in.